Comments on: Implicits For Cleaner Code Indeed, on the way into the office I realised that I should've mentioned that specifically in the post, will put some sensibly worded tweak in there later. Indeed, on the way into the office I realised that I should’ve mentioned that specifically in the post, will put some sensibly worded tweak in there later.

]]>
By: Associat0r/2011/02/14/implicits-for-cleaner-code/#comment-786 Associat0r Tue, 15 Feb 2011 13:50:47 +0000 Be aware that the dot product example is gonna have allocation overhead, implicits don''t behave like a zero overhead static compile-time type extension like in C#. Be aware that the dot product example is gonna have allocation overhead, implicits don”t behave like a zero overhead static compile-time type extension like in C#.

]]>
By: Sean Parsons/2011/02/14/implicits-for-cleaner-code/#comment-780 Sean Parsons Tue, 15 Feb 2011 08:12:37 +0000 The second part of the article is very cool btw The second part of the article is very cool btw

]]>
By: Kenpex/2011/02/14/implicits-for-cleaner-code/#comment-777 Kenpex Tue, 15 Feb 2011 03:39:16 +0000 Sorry but this solution is worse than the original problem imho. Yes you've separated implementation of dot from the vector, but basically you did that by "hacking" the syntax that is very bad. Many languages allow such hacking, infamously c++, and you can do very neat things with that (i.e. Boost lambda) but in practice the increment the WTF/minute of your source and are universally banned from commercial projects. Sorry but this solution is worse than the original problem imho. Yes you’ve separated implementation of dot from the vector, but basically you did that by “hacking” the syntax that is very bad. Many languages allow such hacking, infamously c++, and you can do very neat things with that (i.e. Boost lambda) but in practice the increment the WTF/minute of your source and are universally banned from commercial projects.

]]>
By: Tweets that mention Implicits For Cleaner Code » #AltDevBlogADay -- Topsy.com/2011/02/14/implicits-for-cleaner-code/#comment-774 Tweets that mention Implicits For Cleaner Code » #AltDevBlogADay -- Topsy.com Tue, 15 Feb 2011 02:38:05 +0000 [...]

]]>